lists.zerezo.com
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [PATCH] [PATCH] v4l: Introduce "index" attribute for?persistent video4linux device nodes
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 18:48:50 +0200
- From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [PATCH] [PATCH] v4l: Introduce "index" attribute for?persistent video4linux device nodes
On Thursday 17 July 2008 18:44:23 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On Thursday 17 July 2008 18:40:47 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 25 June 2008 00:59:51 Brandon Philips wrote:
> > >> On 00:34 Tue 24 Jun 2008, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Brandon Philips wrote:
> > >>>> + for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> > >>>> + if (used & (1 << i))
> > >>>> + continue;
> > >>>> + return i;
> > >>>> + }
> > >>>
> > >>> i = ffz(used);
> > >>> return i >= 32 ? -ENFILE : i;
> > >>
> > >> Err. Right :D Tested and pushed.
> > >>
> > >> Mauro-
> > >>
> > >> Updated http://ifup.org/hg/v4l-dvb to have Trent's improvement.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >>
> > >> Brandon
> > >
> > > Hi Mauro,
> > >
> > > I think you missed this pull request from Brandon. Can you merge
> > > this?
> >
> > Yes, I missed that one.
> >
> > Yet, I didn't like the usage of "32" magic numbers on those parts:
> >
> > - if (num >= VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES)
> > +
> > + if (num >= 32) {
> > + printk(KERN_ERR "videodev: %s num is too large\n",
> > __func__);
> >
> > + return i >= 32 ? -ENFILE : i;
> >
> >
> > It seems better to use VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES as the maximum limit on
> > both usages of "32".
> >
> > Brandon,
> >
> > Could you fix and re-send me a pull request?
>
> Mauro, Brandon,
>
> If you do not mind, then I'll do this. I'm working on videodev.c
> anyway (making it compatible with kernels <2.6.19) so it's easy for
> me to do merge this and make the necessary adjustment. And I can test
> it with a 2.6.18 kernel at the same time.
Correction, the 32 refers to the number of bits in an u32, not to
VIDEO_NUM_DEVICES. So I think you can just merge this patch as is. It
does not conflict with my videodev.c changes (amazingly), so it is no
problem if you merge this change.
Regards,
Hans
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list