lists.zerezo.com
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
***BOGO*** RE: recommended high availability setups
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:37:45 -0400
- From: Martin Gainty <mgainty@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: ***BOGO*** RE: recommended high availability setups
agador-
did you look at replication implementations using master/slave configuration?
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/replication-solutions-diffengines.html
HTH/
Martin
______________________________________________
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:38:37 -0700
> From: sparctacus@xxxxxxxxx
> To: mysql@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: recommended high availability setups
>
> What's the recommended method for high-availability setups?
>
> I've currently got a master-master replication setup that I'm testing
> but it doesn't quite seem as complete a solution as I had pictured.
>
> When a failed server comes back online you still have to manually add
> it based off of the line numbers/binlog correct? And adding a new DB
> requires reloading the MySQL server?
>
> I've been looking around at other technologies as well like linux-ha.
> What are other people using for systems that have to be up 100% of the
> time but aren't complete nightmares to manage?
>
> TIA!
>
> -Bryan
>
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql?unsub=mgainty@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get ideas on sharing photos from people like you. Find new ways to share.
http://www.windowslive.com/explore/photogallery/posts?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_Photo_Gallery_082008