On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 09:56:56AM +0200, Benjamin Zores wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:35 AM, Michael Niedermayer <michaelni@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:03:07PM +0200, Benjamin Zores wrote: > > > Iam fine with any name as long as it doesnt end in _t because that is > > reserved by POSIX, not that a mp_*_t is likely going to ever clash in > > pratice but still. > > For my culture, isn't _t purpose actually to declare that something it > a new type of variable (typedef, struct ...) ? Tell that to the people who designed posix ... btw: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/xsh_chap02_02.html contains the list of what posix claims for itself ... [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I count him braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his enemies for the hardest victory is over self. -- Aristotle
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ MPlayer-dev-eng mailing list MPlayer-dev-eng@xxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/mplayer-dev-eng