***BOGO*** Re: Firefox 3 still hogs memory

[Ron Hunter <rphunter@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
> Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:14:22 +0200, /squaredancer/:
> 
>> the older NT versions only required 8-12 MB - which of course, doesn't 
>> mean that they actually "performed".
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT#Hardware_requirements>
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_3.1x#Windows_for_Workgroups_3.1>
>> also interesting - release dates:
>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Windows#Timeline_of_releases>
>>
>> and if you still need some EDO-RAM... on the cheap...
>> <http://www.google.com/products?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22EDO+RAm%22&um=1&sa=X&oi=product_result_group&resnum=1&ct=title> 
>>
>>
>> 32MB for US$666.33 (so that todays' youth know what computers once cost!)
> 
> I've bought 32MB (the max my 486 DX2 mother-board could load) for almost 
> exactly 1050 USD, somewhere around 1994.
> 
You should adjust the cost to show what that much money in 1994 dollars 
would be now.  Rather startling.


-- 
Ron Hunter  rphunter@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
general mailing list
general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/general