***BOGO*** Re: [Mingw-users] InterlockedIncrement/Decrement missing volatile qualifier?

[Brandon Sneed <brandon@xxxxxxx>]

On Jun 25, 2008, at 1:05 PM, Keith Marshall wrote:
> Do please note that reporting bugs here is much less likely to bear
> similar fruit; you need to use the bug tracker.
>

Very true.  The upside is, your post got me to check the bug tracker  
and I've just made the fix to those two functions and the other  
Increment* ones that were affected.

See the bug here...

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1996620&group_id=2435&atid=102435

If anyone would be so kind as to do additional verification of the fix  
(i did verify compilation, gcc 4.2.1-sjlj, and a small example with  
InterlockedIncrement) it would be helpful.



Brandon Sneed


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
MinGW-users mailing list
MinGW-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users