lists.zerezo.com
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
***BOGO*** Re: [Mingw-users] InterlockedIncrement/Decrement missing volatile qualifier?
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:05:10 +0100
- From: Keith Marshall <keithmarshall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: ***BOGO*** Re: [Mingw-users] InterlockedIncrement/Decrement missing volatile qualifier?
On Wednesday 25 June 2008 04:31:03 Jason Cipriani wrote:
> InterlockedIncrement and InterlockedDecrement:
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms683614(VS.85).aspx
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms683580.aspx
>
> Take a pointer to a volatile LONG as a parameter:
>
> LONG __cdecl InterlockedDecrement(
> __inout LONG volatile *Addend
> );
>
> In MinGW there is no volatile...
Indeed, another user has recently filed a formal bug report for this
very issue, so there is a strong likelihood of this being addressed
in the next release of the API.
Do please note that reporting bugs here is much less likely to bear
similar fruit; you need to use the bug tracker.
Regards,
Keith.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
MinGW-users mailing list
MinGW-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users