On Thursday 17 January 2008 19:46:46 Richard wrote: > Well, after reviewing Dolphin the new file manager for KDE 4, and Firefox 3 > Beta3. I could not help but think?, there must something serious wrong > with Konqueror... > There have been many complaints that konqueror is too big, too complicated, too configurable, so it was decided that a lighter weight file manager was in order. For those of us that like its configurability, we get to keep konqueror. Konqueror does, however, have its roots in old code, and it has proved very difficult to keep up to date in terms of web browsing because of that. The funny thing is that while there are some sites that Konqueror just can't handle, today I met one with a form which Firefox displayed wrongly - missing a field completely, and therefore could not be returned. Konqueror displayed it and sent it off without a problem. I find it very necessary to have both FF and Konq to hand. Once kde4 settles down it will be time to decide where web browsing goes in kde - though the decisions are probably made already. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___________________________________________________ This message is from the kde-linux mailing list. Account management: https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-linux. Archives: http://lists.kde.org/. More info: http://www.kde.org/faq.html.