> Is it out of the question for KDE to use Launchpad.net for bug/feature > tracking. It does a lot of the tracking needed, and I think it's far > easier to use than bugzilla (which I've found to be daunting). The problem with launchpad is that it's a bit of a double edge sword. Obviously it being a proprietary service is an issue, but at the same time the main advantages of the way Launchpad works relies one everyone using the same system and the only real way to enforce that is to keep it closed. It's a shame really because I like the system personally and I think it has some really good advantages but at the same time it sucks that it's closed source. -- Nick Ogden Email: nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxx PGP: 2598FEE4 Web: www.nickogden.net On Monday 30 June 2008 08:41:20 Tom Albers wrote: > Op maandag 30 juni 2008 02:58 schreef u: > > Is it out of the question for KDE to use Launchpad.net for bug/feature > > tracking. It does a lot of the tracking needed, and I think it's far > > easier to use than bugzilla (which I've found to be daunting). > > I've seen a lot of resistance in KDE to use that. I think the main reason > was that it is not open-source, but there might have been more reasons. > > > Also, there's a kde4 offline client application in early development > > stages. > > http://www.sourcecode.de/content/leonov-launchpad-desktop-client-first-co > >ming > > Yes, I saw that, that's looking great and beats bugbuster ten times > already. I'ld love to have that. > > Toma
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<