On Wednesday 25 June 2008, FiNeX wrote: > I want to ask this to you, KDE developers, do you agree on this > argumentation? +1, but that's just me. > What do you think if I propose to adopt a centralized tool for managing the > development processes like development plans, feature planning and so on? i don't think you'll find much dissent. > Do you think it is feasibile? that's the real question. and it'll come down to process and tools. what you suggest is a large amount of work. as much as any other sort of contribution that goes into making KDE. and probably just as valuable, imho. as such it would end up becoming a "KDE project" in its own right. my questions would be: * which tools do we use? * where do we get the manpower to do it? honestly, i think a wiki with an editorial staff is enough for (a). and i think (b) would be best served by a group of active and concerned mostly-users-but-also-contributors. but again, that's just me. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Trolltech
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<