Re: RFC: grafts generalised

["Stephen R. van den Berg" <srb@xxxxxxx>]

Johannes Sixt wrote:
>Stephen R. van den Berg schrieb:
>> Actually, ripple-through changes are rare.  In the current project it
>> seems I need exactly one, but it's buried deep in the past (sadly).
>> The reason why I need it, is to make sure that git-bisect will work for
>> any revision in the past (i.e. the tree contained/contains some
>> too-clever-for-their-own-good $Revision$-expansion dependencies)

>But you do know that you don't need to apply the change *now*; you can
>apply it at bisect-time? Unless you expect you or your mere mortal
>coworkers are going to do dozens of bisects into that part of the history,
>I wouldn't change history *like*this*. But of course, I don't understand
>the circumstances enough, so... just my 2 cents.

That is exactly the case, I do expect dozens of bisects.
-- 
Sincerely,
           Stephen R. van den Berg.

This is a day for firm decisions!  Or is it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html