***BOGO*** Re: call for seconds: on firmware

[Steve Langasek <vorlon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:42:19AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>         I do not think throwing options out because they are not of a
>  narrow and limited scope is right. The proposer and sponsors can
>  withdraw them, if they think the scope is too broad for the problem at
>  hand. No one else should be removing them from consideration as a
>  solution to the Lenny issue.

The proposers and sponsors of option 5 didn't propose this as an amendment
to the current GR.  Why should they have to *withdraw* the proposal in order
to get it considered separately at a later time?

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@xxxxxxxxxx                                     vorlon@xxxxxxxxxx


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx