***BOGO*** Re: call for seconds: on firmware

[Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Nov 15 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:

> Charles Plessy <plessy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> we all agree that the result of "Further discussion" is the following,
>> don't we?
>>
>>     i Do we require source for firmware in main:                 As usual
>>    ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs:  As usual
>>   iii What do we do for Lenny:                                   Release
>>    iV Do we modify foundation documents:                         No
>>     v Do we override foundation documents                        No
>
> Hm, no, the impression that I got from this discussion that at least
> several people here think the result of "Further discussion" is:
>
>     i Do we require source for firmware in main:                 Yes
>    ii Do we allow the Release Team to ignore SC violation bugs:  No
>   iii What do we do for Lenny:                                   Wait
>    iV Do we modify foundation documents:                         No
>     v Do we override foundation documents                        No
>
> and that seems to be consistent with what Manoj is ruling about overrides
> of the SC.

        This is my reading, yes. As far as I see, the SC is pretty
 clear, and leaves us no other option.

        manoj
-- 
UNIX was half a billion (500000000) seconds old on Tue Nov 5 00:53:20
1985 GMT (measuring since the time(2) epoch).  -- Andy Tannenbaum
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx