lists.zerezo.com
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:59:39 +1000
- From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
Felipe Sateler <fsateler@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I still don't understand why a SIGTERM is needed. If proper cleanup
> is not needed, why not just SIGKILL and be done with it? Is there a
> real reason?
My understanding only:
It is preferable for processes to clean up after themselves, which is
the semantic of SIGTERM. Only those processes which were not able to
do so in a timely manner will be abruptly killed with SIGKILL.
--
\ “Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.” (“Whatever is |
`\ said in Latin, sounds profound.”) —anonymous |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- ***BOGO*** Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- From: Petter Reinholdtsen
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?
- From: Petter Reinholdtsen
- ***BOGO*** Re: Not stopping daemons, where are we?