lists.zerezo.com
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
***BOGO*** Re: Debian release versioning
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:28:10 -0400
- From: lsorense@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lennart Sorensen)
- Subject: ***BOGO*** Re: Debian release versioning
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:21:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'm not sure sure that we want to have a hole in our versioning scheme.
> Since "lenny+1/2" is just another stable update, let's just number it
> like a stable update. So we don't end up with users thinking "You
> released 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.5. Where is 5.4 ?"
Do VMware users complain about 6.0, 6.0.1, 6.0.2, 6.0.3, 6.0.4, 6.5,
etc? The .5 for them is a major update with some new features, but
still a free upgrade while the next .0 costs money. The half update is
bigger than normal revisions, so a jump in version number seems
perfectly reasonable there. Of course I don't see anything wrong with
the XrY style currently used either, although maybe some people find it
strange.
--
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx