lists.zerezo.com
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
***BOGO*** Re: Package management unsafe?
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 10:13:35 +0200
- From: Franklin PIAT <fpiat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: ***BOGO*** Re: Package management unsafe?
On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 16:19 +0930, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-07-13 at 02:13 +0200, Franklin PIAT wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Sat, 2008-07-12 at 23:13 +0000, Joe Smith wrote:
> > > Andrei Popescu <andreimpopescu <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > >
>
> >
> > One costly solution would be to get the client the send a challenge to a
> > trusted server, which would respond by gpg-signed the challenge + the
> > checksum of current .Release file.
>
> How would all these schemes work with offline mirrors? eg, ones that are
> built, and used without an internet connection for a month.
You would be warned that your security update server can't be
contacted/validated, which is accurate.
BTW, of course, the GPG wouldn't have to be Debian key, but any trusted
key for that purpose (e.g including corporate, Debian derivative key).
Franklin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx