***BOGO*** Re: Packages not removable because the `/etc/init.d/package stop' fails.

[Steve Langasek <vorlon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:52:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Russ Allbery <rra@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> > Well, it's an RC bug (violation of the must in Policy 9.3.2) for the
> > stop action of an init script to fail if the daemon is not running,
> > which is fairly serious.  I think it could well warrant a stable update
> > if it's causing problems for upgrades to lenny.

> Actually, I take that back -- it's not on the lenny RC bug list, so it's
> possibly not an RC bug.  It would be if Policy and the release goals were
> synchronized and the must stayed in that case, but it's ambiguous right
> now.  If this truly shouldn't be RC, Policy should be changed to make sane
> init script behavior a should instead.

It was ambiguous before the latest policy commit because reasonable people
could disagree about what "sane" behavior of an init script was, but in
practice, bugs that prevent a package from being upgradeable (such as
missing conflicts/replaces, broken maintainer scripts that fail to handle
the previous package version, etc.) have always been considered de facto RC
in the past, regardless of whether they're policy violations.  I don't see
any evidence that the release team has changed this practice for lenny.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@xxxxxxxxxx                                     vorlon@xxxxxxxxxx


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx