lists.zerezo.com
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
***BOGO*** Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs)
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 22:12:06 +0300
- From: Guillem Jover <guillem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: ***BOGO*** Re: Bug#426877: dpkg: Option "--oknodo" should be the default behaviour for "start-stop-daemon" (LSB specs)
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:47:39 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > I think being LSB compliant is good for Debian.
>
> The LSB init script specification *is a specification for the init scripts
> of LSB packages*. It has NOTHING to do with LSB compliance of LSB
> implementations. Debian is an LSB *implementation*, NOT a collection of LSB
> applications. Conforming with the LSB init script specification would NOT
> make Debian packages conformant LSB applications!
>
> The LSB init script spec is a reasonable and internally consistent set of
> guidelines for init scripts. It's not a bad policy; in fact, 90% of it is
> word-for-word identical with the Debian init script policy. But the LSB
> init script spec is *not* the Debian init script policy, and we should not
> blindly seek conformance to an LSB *application* spec for its own sake.
Agreed.
> I happen to be in favor of seeing Debian adopt at least one feature of the
> LSB init script spec that we miss, which is the mandatory 'status' argument.
> But this needs to be adopted as part of Debian policy itself, through our
> normal procedures for such changes.
Yeah, this is something I've on my TODO list, most of the needed code
is already on s-s-d. Will try to get something working this weekend.
regards,
guillem
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx